Nothing Fair About Fairness Doctrine

If the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" is reinstated, it would muzzle conservative talk radio -- or so says the leader of a pro-Israel ministry based in Minnesota. Jan Markell is concerned about legislation afoot on Capitol Hill that would bring back a policy rescinded by Ronald Reagan almost 20 years ago.

Markell says the Fairness Doctrine, if reinstated, would effectively muzzle her program and others like it. She claims the goal of liberals is not balance, but instead to "destroy conservative and Christian media by requiring that each segment of every show contains the counterbalancing liberal viewpoint." She adds that such "draconian hyper-monitoring" would destroy her program.
Read Full Story HERE


Freedom of speech is a constitutional right of every person. If someone wants to talk about something and they are paying for the air time then they should not be told what they have to have on their show.

Some news channels try to have a balanced report on both sides of the issue that they are reporting on and that is a good thing. While other news channels cover everything with a certain kind of bias about it. This is the most common. But in regards to organizations that are paying for their air time then, again, it should be completely up to them whether they choose to have an opponent on their show.

Grassfire.org Alliance

From Steve Elliott
President
Grassfire.org Alliance



They claim to be defenders of the defenseless, but that
simply isn’t true. The American Civil Liberties Union
is no friend of our nation or its people.

The ACLU is openly attacking our faith, religious freedom,
family values and the founding principles that have
defined our nation for more than two hundred years.

And the worst part is, most Americans have no idea as
to the true motivation and intent of the ACLU. The real
ACLU was founded by Roger Baldwin who said, "We (the ALCU)
are for socialism, disarmament and ultimately for
abolishing the state itself... we seek the social ownership
of property... and the sole control of those who produce
wealth. Communism is the goal."

True to their founder’s words, the ACLU has lined their
coffers with untold millions doing just that!

The ACLU doesn't support traditional marriage, or the family.
Instead they defend drug dealers, registered sex offenders,
and those who distribute child pornography!

The ACLU doesn't stand for the rights of believers to
freely worship. Instead they are aggressively working
to prevent faith-based ministries from publicly sharing
the Gospel.

Their policies are undermining our nation--pushing a
radical agenda that supports polygamy, child pornography,
infanticide, gun control and more.

Now, given a new liberal-led Congress, we expect that the
ACLU will be emboldened with confidence to exact an even
greater toll on our freedoms.

++ Taking Back America

Grassfire doesn't believe it has to be this way.

In fact by partnering with Liberty Counsel,
one of the nation's pre-eminent legal defense organizations,
grassroots citizens eager to see their First Amendment
Rights preserved, have a voice!

But that's not all. Liberty Counsel is beating the ACLU in
courtrooms across the land.

The deception that is the ACLU has been exposed, but we
need a strong grassroots component of citizens who are
actively sharing that message to friends, family,
neighbors--and the millions of citizens who are being
deceived.

Please send this important message to 25-30 of
your friends encouraging them to sign our national petition
to expose and defeat the ACLU:

http://www.grassfire.net/81/petition.asp?PID=12080845

We are beating them in the courts, but we need the help of
friends like you to expose them in the court of public opinion!
Thank you for standing with Grassfire and Liberty Counsel
against the ACLU.

Steve Elliott
President
Grassfire.org Alliance

Nuclear-Bomb Grade Uranium Selling In Russia

WASHINGTON Jan 25, 2007 (AP)— It was one of the most serious cases of smuggling of nuclear material in recent years: A Russian man, authorities allege, tried to sell a small amount of nuclear-bomb grade uranium in a plastic bag in his jacket pocket.
To read full story go HERE

A terrifying reality that is going on. What is Russia really doing?
Since the fall of communism in Russia there has been widespread poverty and some people will do anything to make money.

Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri

Al Qaeda has safe haven in Pakistan frontier.
This is the headline of an article from CNN which goes on to say,
Pakistan's tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan have become an accepted haven for al Qaeda leaders such as Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, a senior U.S. intelligence official told CNN on Wednesday.
To read full story go HERE

How long does it take for the most powerful nation in the world to get two men?

I would put to you that it is a conscious decision made by someone in the U.S. administration not to go into Pakistan and get them. I wonder why this would be?

After the billions of dollars spent in Afghanistan someone may be trying to get some of the money back through drug operations?

Afghanistan Refuses U.S Request to Spray Heroin Fields comes from Fox News.
Fueled by the Taliban, a powerful drug mafia and the need for a profitable crop that can overcome drought, opium production from poppies in Afghanistan last year rose 49 percent to 6,700 tons — enough to make about 670 tons of heroin. That's more than 90 percent of the world's supply and more than the world's addicts consume in a year.
To read full story go HERE

Do you really think that the U.S. would allow the Taliban to profit from these crops? Think about it. That money is going somewhere and I say it is not going to the Taliban.

Texas Mayor Singles Out N-Word for Ban

All I can say to that is good luck. Next he can ban the use of the word cracker. How far will that go?
Is Mr. Corley just trying to make a statement, kinda like they did in the 60's?

Mayor Ken Corley of Brazoria, Texas, has proposed a city ordinance that would make using the word in an offensive fashion a crime equal to disturbing the peace and punishable by a fine of up to $500. But legal experts said it's unlikely the law will stand up to the First Amendment.
Read the full story HERE

Here is what the judge says:"This is government trying to take the easy way out," said Judge Andrew Napolitano, a FOX News legal analyst. "When people use words that are harmful, they lack civility and they lack education, but they don't lack the right to say it."

Children Matyrs and Jews as Pigs

SYDNEY, Australia - An Australian Muslim cleric has urged children to be martyrs for Islam and referred to Jews as pigs in a series of DVDs, sparking condemnation by the government and further straining tensions with the nation’s Muslims.

This is from Sheik Feiz Mohammed, head of the Global Islamic Youth Center in Sydney’s western suburbs.

Read full story HERE

-------------------------------------------------------------

Wouldn't everybody want their children to be taught by this "holy man"?
Why do the Muslims not ask any questions about their religion?

U.S. Mexican Border

Francisco Javier Dominguez-Rivera, 22, of Puebla, Mexico, was killed Friday in a confrontation with the unidentified agent north of the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona between Bisbee and Douglas.
Read full story HERE.

This is becoming the standard at the border. If an illegal Mexican is coming over the border and one of our border patrol agents lives are in danger they should not protect themselves. This is where it has gotten to. Mainly because of the two border agents that were sent to prison protecting our border.

On February 17, 2005, U.S. Border Ignacio Ramos (a former nominee for border patrol agent of the Year), and Jose Compean attempted to apprehend a fleeing illegal alien at our border.

Please sign the petition to have the President pardon the two agents that went to prison yesterday HERE

Muslim woman wanted to use a Quran

Quran for courtroom oaths gets green light, lawsuit by ACLU, Muslim woman

By

A ruling from a state appeals court has reopened a case prompted because a Muslim woman wanted to use a Quran – a book that an expert on Islam says allows Muslims to lie under compulsion – on which to swear her oath of honesty in a court hearing. The lawsuit was filed by Sydiah Mateen with help from the American Civil Liberties Union in 2005 after she was denied permission to use a Quran to take the courtroom oath in a case in North Carolina.

Read News from the Web

Online since January 17, 2007 at 06:30:01 AM

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a very good point made above. This woman wants to swear to tell the truth on a book that tells them to lie! How outrages is this and the ACLU?

For more information on ACLU read my posting titled "ACLU And Communism-Believe It" HERE

Religious Freedom Day, 2007

A Proclamation by the President of the United States of America

On Religious Freedom Day, we commemorate the passage of the 1786 Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, authored by Thomas Jefferson, and we celebrate the First Amendment's protection of religious freedom.
Read the entire press release HERE.

Main stream media will not cover this one. It was for immediate release on Jan. 11th 2007. I found it on the VOM BLOG.

From now on Religious Freedom Day is January 16. By the order of The President of the United States of America.

Drugs and Terrorism

There are parents that worry daily if their children will come home or not. They worry whether their child will die due to an overdose or due to the violence related to it. This is terrorism in America also. These are drugs. They are a constant and real threat to our national security. Drugs are being brought in by the tons. If drugs can be why not explosives? Drugs are being brought into our country at an alarming rate. This also makes you think about what else is getting in and no one knowing about it.

A drug smuggler from another country is given immunity and citizenship here in America for testifying for our government against our government agents trying to secure the boarders. Is there nothing wrong with this? The smuggler after being set free was caught again bringing drugs into our country.

This is just the latest story that has been found out by the media. Every single day there are drugs coming into the U.S.A. These drugs do our country tremendous harm and break apart the very fibers of our country. With so much surveillance going on one would think that the drug supply to America could be cut off completely. Also the ones in America manufacturing drugs could be shut down. The truth is there is to much money being made from these illegal activities that it is even enough to corrupt many officials. Here is one: Border Agents: 6 Years for Taking Bribes

The Crimes of Mena is an interesting article concerning our government involved in drug smuggling. Who would have ever thought?

The manufacturing, smuggling, and growing of drugs has been going on long enough. Our country needs to do something about it. But it can start with you. Just as you are vigilant in looking out for terrorists be just as vigilant against drug dealers. Drugs are like high blood pressure, if it goes untreated it could kill you.

Drugs have been a part of this country and its problems for decades. Violent crimes have been associated with drugs. Here is an option for our borders: Pakistan to Use Mines to Stop Militants
If our border agents cannot do their job and secure our borders then why not use the Pakistan way to do it? Yes, it is that bad and has been for a long time.

Why is it that the government can keep us safe from terrorists but not drug smugglers?

Arab-American and Muslim-American

During the next few weeks, as many as 20,000 American Muslims will be returning to the United States from their pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. The TSA has ramped up cultural-awareness training for all 43,000 of its screeners. The goal: to remind screeners what to expect from devout Muslims and how to go about screening them so it's in concert with their religious beliefs.

Arab-American and Muslim-American leaders are applauding the effort. But they say it's part of a much-needed larger cultural and political conversation about Islam and Arab culture that can help the nation as it heals from the aftereffects of 9/11.

This from Christian Science Monitor.

---------------------------------------------------------

Muslims are allowed to shorten prayers and/or combine them during travel.
Shortening prayers
Combining prayers
Fasting while traveling

These links are from About.com.

---------------------------------------------------------

How about just Americans, as in The United States of America?

Islamworld.net Miss Use Of The Holy Bible

Islamworld.net is a good example of what you are not supposed to do with The Holy Bible. You are not supposed to interpret. In 2 Peter 1:20: Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 21: For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

We cannot just put in whatever word we think should go there. All the words where put there by the Holy Spirits' direction and no changes are to be made. They are using a word that is not meant to be in the Bible. The word is Paraclete. They say that this word is used in John 14:16: "And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;" I see where it says Comforter, meaning the Holy Spirit.

This is the title of their article: Did Jesus and Isaiah PROPHESY the coming of MUHAMMAD? It can be seen HERE

I will answer that using the scripture of the Holy Bible.

Matthew 7:15: Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16: Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17: Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18: A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

Matthew 27:11: And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.

Matthew 24:24: For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

2 Peter 2: 1: But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

1 John 4: 1: Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

Democrat Leadership Breaks Promise

Washington Weekly Review Friday, January 5, 2007 Roberta Combs, Chairman House Democrat Leadership Breaks Promise to American People and Refuse Republicans Opportunity to Participate in Legislative Process Right after their victory in the November 7th elections, the newly-elected Democrat leadership, led by Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from San Francisco, said they would be giving Republicans full participation in legislative proceedings when they took over Congress in January 2007. Unfortunately for the American people, the House Democrat leadership has already broken its promises setting up the scenerio for yet another 2 years of fierce partisanship in the 110th Congress. The ranking member of the the House Rules Committee, Congressman David Dreier, regarding the House Democrats breaking their promises to the American people during the 2006 campaign: "It is totally inconsistent as to what was promised during the campaign process," (as reported on Fox News on January 4, 2007.) House Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-MO, was quoted in "The Washington Times" on January 4, 2007, "We think we need to have an opportunity to offer alternatives." Congressman Blunt also said, "In their first one hundred hours of governance, House Democrats will renege on a pledge to fully debate policy alternatives, denying citizens of this country an open, honest discussion of the issues. The House Democrat leadership has announced that they will use the rules of the House of Representatives to stop House Republicans from offering alternative legislation which will allow the Democrats to railroad through legislation quickly so they can claim some legislative victories. The "Washington Post" has castigated the House Democrat leadership in an editorial saying that they are using undemocratic procedures to ram their legislation through the House of Representatives. The "Washington Post" said, "Unfortunately, plans (by Nancy Pelosi) don't include getting those provisions passed in the democratic fashion that the Democrats promised to adhere to once in the majority." Democrat-controlled House of Representatives Set to Railroad Through Tax-Payer-funded Human Embryo Destruction Research Bill Which President Bush Vetoed in 2006/Christian Coalition Will Score Votes on all New 60 Members of House in this Important Vote One of the bills, H. R. 3, which the Democrat-led House of Representatives will ram-rod through next Thursday, January 11th, without any Republican or pro-life input, is a human embryonic stem cell destruction research bill on which President George W. Bush used his one and only veto during his presidency during 2006. H.R. 3 is similar or identical to H.R. 810, which President Bush vetoed last July. And the Republican-led House upheld President Bush's veto. Christian Coalition of America will score in the Congressional Scorecard the vote of all members of the House of Representatives, including the nearly 60 new Members of the House, on this critically-important vote on H.R. 3, which will force American taxpayers to pay for this destructive, useless and immoral research which has produced zero results. On the other hand adult stem cell research has resulted in the treatment of humans afflicted with more than 70 ailments, including non-controversial sources such as umbilical cord blood. ACTION: Call your Congressman (especially if you are a constituent of one of the 60 new members of the House) and call your 2 Senators at 202-225-3121 or you can go to http://www.cc.org/contactcongress.cfm and urge them to vote against H.R.3, the human embryonic stem cell destruction research bill. Massachusetts Legislature FINALLY Votes on Ban on Homosexual "Marriage/New Jersey Democrat Party and Legislators on the New Jersey Supreme Court Trample on N.J. Citizens' Rights and Forced Homosexual Civil Unions on the State of New Jersey/Governor Jon Corzine Signs Bill in December Defying Overwhelming Majority of New Jersey Citizens who are Against Homosexual "Marriages" The Massachusetts state legislature finally voted on Tuesday on a state constitutional amendment banning homosexual "marriage," in the only state in the United States which had state judges force such "marriages" on the citizens of Massachusetts, contrary to a large majority of Massachusetts citizens who oppose such abominations. The measure stilll has to pass another joint legislative session before it can be placed on the November 2008 ballot. The bill will redefine marriage in Massachusetts and put an end to the travesty of judicially-imposed homosexual "marriages" in Massachusetts when the citizens, as expected, vote overwhelmingly in 2008 to ban such "marriages." On July 10, 2006, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court voted unanimously that the citizens of Massachusetts could vote to overturn their 4-3 ruling in 2004 approving homosexual "marriages." Much like the Massachusetts Democrat Party has recently done in the state legislature before Tuesday's vote, defying the majority of its citizens who are against homosexual "marriages," the New Jersey State Legislature, dominated by liberal Democrats, passed a bill in December allowing homosexuals to have civil unions with all the rights of traditional marriages. New Jersey Democrat Governor Jon Corzine also defied the overwhelming majority of New Jersey citizens and signed the bill into law. A recent poll (Eagleton/Rutgers, Oct. 29-31) showed that New Jersey citizens oppose homosexual "marriage" by a margin of 54% to 38%. During the last week of October, the judicial tyrants on the New Jersey Supreme Court dictated to the New Jersey State Legislature that they MUST give homosexual couples the same rights as married heterosexual couples, defying the will of the overwhelming majority of the American people. They stopped short (in a 4-3 decision) of declaring that homosexual couples could "marry" in the State of New Jersey, unlike the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court which in February 2004 forced homosexual "marriages" on the citizens of Massachusetts even without a vote by the people's representatives in the Massachusetts State Legislature. All seven New Jersey Supreme Court justices agreed that the state's constitution requires that homosexual couples be given the same rights and benefits which heterosexual married couples have under New Jersey's marriage laws. Justice Albin wrote the majority opinion, supported by Justices LaVecchia, Wallace and Rivera-Soto, which would permit the New Jersey state legislature to create a parallel legal structure for homosexual couples which does not bear the title of "marriage." However, in the partial dissent by the radical leader of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Poritz -- who was joined by Justices Long and Zazzali -- the title of "marriage" for homosexual couples would be forced on the citizens of New Jersey. Judicial tyranny in America continues at a rampant pace. After the infamous Massachusetts top court's opinion in 2004, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney said, "We've heard from the court, but not the people. The people of Massachusetts should not be excluded from a decision as fundamental to our society as the definition of marriage." This is exactly what the seven judicial tyrants on New Jersey's top court did in October and what the Democrat-dominated New Jersey state legislature did this month and what N.J. Governor Corzine did last month. They defiantly ignored the will of the citizens of New Jersey and forced the state legislators to approve homosexual "civil unions." The "Wall Street Journal" said in an editorial right after the New Jersey Supreme Court's infamous decision: "This (past) week's New Jersey Supreme Court's judicial diktat on same-sex-somethings (name to be determined later) is a remarkable arrogation of power by the judiciary. The court's belief that it is empowered on social experimentation in the field of marriage is embodied in the words --'We have decided that our State Constitution guarantees that every statutory right and benefit conferred to heterosexual couple through civil marriage must be made available to committed same-sex couples .... (our emphasis.)" A total of 27 states have passed state constitutional amendments banning homosexual "marriages." The seven which passed amendments last month are: Colorado, Idaho, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and Wisconsin. The 20 states which have already passed state constitutional amendments, with an average majority vote of 70% for these amendments, are: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Lousiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Ohio, Oregon, Texas and Utah. Christian Coalition state chapters in the 23 states which do not have such amendments will continue to work hard to get such amendments on the state ballots so that citizens in every state in the Union has an opportunity to ban homosexual "marriages." There is no doubt that there is a huge majority in each and every state in the United States in support for traditional marriage between only one man and one woman. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Panel Sharply Questions Federal Government Lawyer Defending the Federal Communication Commission's New Enforcement Policy Against Profanities in Broadcasts A 3-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in middle December sharply questioned the government lawyer, Eric D. Miller, who was defending the new enforcement policies of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) against "accidental" use of profanities in broadcasts. Broadcasters are constantly pushing the envelope of what is decent in the vast wasteland of television. Fox Television Stations Inc. and other broadcasters had asked the appeals court to overturn the FCC's interpretation and expansion of authority to punish what the FCC cites as indecent speech. According to the Associated Press report on December 21st, the broadcasters had challenged the FCC's finding of indecency in regards to a December 9, 2002, broadcast of the Billboard Music Awards in which the "singer" Cher used the phrase, "F__ 'em," and a December 10, 2003, Billboard awards show in which reality show "star" Nicole Richie said: "Have you every tried to get cow s____ out of a Prada purse? It's not so f___ simple." Included in the arguments were references to a January 2003 broadcast of the Golden Globes awards show by NBC when the equally coarse U2 lead singer Bono uttered the phrase "f___ brilliant." A year later, the FCC said the "F-word" in any context "inherently has a sexual connotation" and can be subject to enforcement act. Christian Coalition of America played a major role in getting the United States Congress to increase fines from $32,500 per violation of the decency standards to $325,000 per violation, a 10-fold increase. This bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2006. One of the judges who kept Mr. Miller -- who was defending the FCC's policy on indecency -- on the defensive, Judge Rosemary S. Pooler, asked Mr. Miller why the FCC had cited a need to protect children from profanities when it had cited no studies finding children were injured by them.

Federal Judge Rules That High School Valedictorian, Brittany McComb, Whose Microphone Was Turned Off Because She Talked About God and Her Faith in Jesus Christ, Will Be Able to File a First Amendment Lawsuit in Court
Last June 15th, high school senior Brittany McComb, who was the valedictorian of her class, and thus was able to give a speech to the graduating class and the rest of the audience, had her microphone turned off when she began speaking about God and about her faith in Jesus Christ. High school officials at the Foothill High School, in the Clark County School District, Nevada, had attempted to censor her speech beforehand, but as she was delivering her original speech, her microphone was cut off.

As a result of this unconstitutional act on the part of school officials, her attorneys filed a First Amendment lawsuit stating that the school district violated her right to free speech. All she wanted to tell the audience of some 400 fellow students, families and staff, was how her Christian beliefs played played a part in her success. She had finished with the highest grade point average in her high school class. Christian Coalition will follow this case as it winds its way through the judicial system.

Christian Coalition Activists need to Encourage 110th Congress to Pass Both "Net Neutrality" and "Multicast/Equal Access" Legislation to Prevent Discrimination Against Religious Broadcasters /Democrat-controlled Congress Expected to Pass "Net Neutrality"
The lame-duck Republican Senate did not pass a telecommunications bill and thus a "Net Neutrality" provision was not passed in the 109th Congress. "Net Neutrality" is an issue extremely important to America's grassroots organizations and those Americans who want to ensure the cable and phone companies controlling access to the Internet will not discriminate against groups like Christian Coalition of America. Although AT & T recently made an agreement with the FCC that it would agree to "net neutrality" in order to merge with BellSouth Corp. in a $86 billion merger, the agreement only lasts 2 years. Therefore Congress must pass "net neutrality" legislation in order to make it permanent.

It is anticipated that the Democrat-controlled Congress will agree with the position of the recent House Judiciary Committee Chairman, James Sensenbrenner, Republican-WI, and pass a "Net Neutrality" bill during the 110th Congress. If "Net Neutrality" legislation does not pass, consumers will have to pay an additional fee to have a website. The cable/telephone monopoly will be dividing the Internet into a "fast track" and "slow track." Our grassroots, who cannot afford the additional fees, will have to be on the slow track, which will mean that many of our websites will be passed by because the general public will not have the patience to go on the "slow track".

In addition, if a Board member on an Internet Service Provider (cable/telephone monopoly) does not like Christian Coalition of America emails, they can and will block our emails from going out over their server. The Senate telecom bill as it is currently written will harm us from getting our message out. We cannot let the cable/telephone monopoly control the Internet and content.

"Multicast/Equal Access" (formerly called "Multicast/Must-carry") will go a long way to preventing discrimination against religious broadcasters. Without a "Multicast/Equal Access" law, the cable and satellite companies would probably not add new Christian channels and the influence of current Christian channels will be diluted.

Please continue to ask your Members of Congress to support “Multicast/Equal Access” and religious broadcasters. Call your Congressman and 2 Senators at 202-225-3121 or you can go to http://www.cc.org/contactcongress.cfm and email them and let them know we need a “Multicast/Equal Access” and "Net Neutrality" legislation to pass in the 110th Congress.

Please sign our petition and join the Faith & Family Television Task Force at http://www.cc.org/taskforce.cfm encourage your family, friends and church friends to also sign the petition at our website join the Christian Coalition’s Judicial Task Force, which is dedicated to ending the obstruction of the President's judicial nominees and ensuring that they ALL receive a fair "up or down" vote by the full Senate. There are a number of President Bush's Circuit Court of Appeals' nominees who have not yet received a Senate floor vote. The challenge to confirm President Bush's nominees in a Democrat-controlled Senate will be very difficult and we need your help in doing just that. You will become part of a team of individuals who are committed to being ready on a moment’s notice to take action when obstruction occurs.

Please keep the above issues in prayer. Through prayer and action great and mighty things can be accomplished.

Psalm 33:12 “Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord…”

Please be sure to forward this message on to as many people as possible!

SUPPORT THE CHRISTIAN COALITION Click here to make a secure online donation	Christian Coalition of America P.O. Box 37030 Washington, D.C. 20013 Telephone: (202) 479-6900 Fax: (202) 479-4262 www.cc.org

Christian Solidarity International or Rick Warren

Who do you believe? Did Rick Warren have an agenda other than one of God?

By Allie Martin
January 3, 2007

(AgapePress) - An official with Christian Solidarity International (CSI) says the once thriving Christian majority in Syria has now been transformed into a small, frightened community. According to published reports, thousands of believers are fleeing from war-torn Iraq into Syria, but the Islamic nation provides no safe refuge for Christians.

Read Full Story Here

To read the story from CSI go Here

This makes you wonder where exactly did Rick Warren visit when he made the following comments, along with others similar to this.

Rick Warren's Words
"Syria's a place that has Muslims and Christians living together for 1,400 years. So it's a lot more peaceful, honestly, than a lot of other places because Christians were here first.

This only leads one to believe one of two things. Either he did not actually do any kind of research while he was in Syria or he had another agenda that included lying to every one.

Either way I cannot understand what a so called, man of God, would do this.